By this standard, an individual or entity may be considered to have not acted in good faith if they did not act reasonably and knew their was no reasonable basis for their actions. For example, a party refusing to make their car payments due to a personal issue with someone at the dealership would be acting without good faith in an unreasonable manner. By this standard, an individual or entity may be considered to have not acted in good faith if they refused to adhere to their side of a contract for no reason that relates to the terms of the contract. This concept applies to many field of law, but is especially important in commercial law, where it can apply to many situations, including contract and settlement negotiations, mediation, arbitration, and general business dealings.Īcting in good faith may have a variety of meanings for a variety of situations, but in the eyes of the courts, there will be generally one of two meanings applied to a case to determine if good faith was upheld or not, and these are: Benefits of the Good Faith Doctrine Good Faith and Bad Faith OverviewĪcting in good faith, or bona fide, as it is sometimes also referred to by the courts, refers to the concept of being sincere in one’s business dealings and without a desire to defraud, deceive, take undo advantage, or in any way act maliciously towards others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |